Talk:National Association of Base Ball Players

Baseball: Old-time Base Ball Mid‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Old-time Base Ball task force (assessed as High-importance).

Members

Tonight as a day or two ago I revised the list of Teams, this time renaming it. Beside what is explained in this section of the text, such as naming five NAPBBP members in bold, I began and then mainly undid an experiment in layout and presentation that belongs in my user space, adding and later deleting more than a dozen clubs. For the clubs that remain listed, date revisions should reflect my checking against Wright (2000) and names revisions should reflect my checking for internal link names that are already in use. The diffs engine probably overstates the revision. --P64 02:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's right. For tonight's session, the diffs engine is out of phase in its line-by-line comparision of the first 16 list entries. Only after Newark Adriatic, which I moved from first to third in the Newark section of the list (thus ordering it by first membership year), the diffs engine is back in phase. --P64 02:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

further experiments in how to convey something without inundating the reader . . .

still retaining someone's list of Newark clubs, trimmed from nine to eight because Wright lists only eight as sometime members --P64 04:20, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Champions

1870 "Officials decided" --was this game not declared forfeit on the spot? --P64 02:55, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]